• Book Your Appointment
  • Buy Your Treatment Now
  • Offers
  • Price List
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
IPL vs Laser: Which Light Treatment Is Right for Your Hair or Skin?

Date

IPL vs Laser: Which Light Treatment Is Right for Your Hair or Skin?

IPL and laser are often spoken about as if they are the same thing. They are not, and the difference changes what each one is good at.

A laser produces a single, precise wavelength of light. IPL, which stands for intense pulsed light, produces a broad band of wavelengths at once, which can then be filtered to suit the target. In practice that makes laser the more focused tool and IPL the more versatile one, and it is why the honest answer to “which is better” is always “better at what”.

The short version: for removing hair, laser has the stronger evidence behind it. For treating sun damage and redness across a wider area of skin, IPL is usually the better fit. And for anyone with a deeper skin tone, the choice narrows considerably, which we will come to.

What Is Actually Different

A laser emits one wavelength of coherent light. Because that wavelength is chosen deliberately, the energy goes where it is aimed and very little is wasted on anything else.

IPL works differently. It uses a flashlamp to produce non-coherent light across roughly 500 to 1200 nanometres, with cut-off filters used to block the shorter wavelengths and tailor the output to the target. That broad output means IPL can act on more than one target in the same pass, including the pigment in a sun spot and the blood in a dilated vessel.

Both rely on the same underlying principle. Light is absorbed by something darker than the surrounding tissue, that something heats up, and the heat damages it while leaving the skin around it comparatively unaffected. In hair removal the target is the pigment in the hair. In pigmentation it is the melanin in the mark. In redness it is the blood inside the vessel.

The practical trade-off is this. Laser gives you precision and depth. IPL gives you breadth and speed over larger areas, since IPL handpieces use large spot sizes that cover big areas quickly, though they can be harder to use on uneven surfaces.

For Hair Removal: Laser

This is the clearest of the three comparisons.

A 2023 network meta-analysis pooled 13 randomised controlled trials involving 652 people, and found that diode laser produced significantly lower hair counts than control at both three and six months, with all observed side effects transient and no permanent scarring. It found no significant difference between the different laser types.

The Cochrane review of laser and light-based hair removal reached a similar conclusion from the other direction: alexandrite and diode lasers showed around 50 per cent hair reduction lasting up to six months, while little evidence was obtained for an effect of intense pulsed light.

That same review makes a point worth holding onto, because it is rarely said plainly in clinic marketing: no treatment had documented permanent hair removal. The NHS puts it the same way, noting that laser hair removal is not permanent and there is no guarantee it will remove all hair. What a good course of treatment achieves is a substantial, long-lasting reduction, with occasional maintenance.

IPL can reduce hair. It is simply the less reliable route, and for a treatment you are committing to over months, reliability matters.

At our Bromley clinic, hair removal is carried out with the Candela GentleMax Pro, a dual-wavelength laser platform. You can read more on our laser hair removal page.

For Sun Damage and Pigmentation: Usually IPL

Here the comparison reverses.

Sun damage tends to arrive as scattered flat brown marks across a wide area, typically the face, chest, shoulders and backs of the hands. A single-wavelength laser treats discrete targets precisely. IPL covers the whole area in far fewer passes, which suits the way this kind of pigmentation actually presents.

IPL is well established for pigmented lesions including solar lentigines and freckles, which are exactly the marks most people mean when they talk about sun damage or age spots. We use the Lumenis Stellar M22 for this, and you can see the detail on our pigmentation removal page.

One significant caveat. Not all brown patches are sun damage, and melasma in particular can react badly to heat and light. Pigmentation needs identifying before it is treated, because the right treatment for one type can worsen another. Where melasma is the diagnosis, a depigmenting approach such as our Cosmelan peel is usually more appropriate than any light-based treatment.

For Redness and Visible Vessels: IPL

Facial redness, flushing and fine broken capillaries are vascular rather than pigmentary, and IPL handles them well because haemoglobin is one of the targets its filtered output can reach.

Published work lists telangiectasias and the erythema of rosacea among the vascular conditions IPL is used to treat. We cover this in more depth on our IPL for rosacea page.

Individual, well-defined vessels are a slightly different problem, and a targeted laser is often the better tool for those. Our laser thread vein removal page explains that side of it. In practice the two are frequently used together: IPL for the diffuse background redness, laser for the specific vessels that remain.

Skin Tone: The Deciding Factor

For many people this matters more than everything above.

Both treatments work by targeting something darker than its surroundings. In deeper skin tones there is more melanin in the surrounding skin itself, so the margin between the target and the background narrows, and the risk of the energy affecting the skin rather than the target rises.

That risk is higher with IPL specifically, because its broad output includes shorter wavelengths that epidermal melanin absorbs readily. Published guidance notes that the risk of residual dyschromia and hyperpigmentation is greater in darker skin, and that filter choice, fluence and pulse settings need particular care. Our IPL treatments are generally most suitable for lighter and medium skin tones.

Laser offers more options here, because a longer wavelength passes the epidermis more safely and reaches the target at depth. This is the reason dual-wavelength platforms exist, and the reason we can offer hair removal across a wider range of skin tones. We have a dedicated page on laser hair removal for dark skin.

The NHS advises that laser hair removal works better on pale skin with dark hair, and that tanned skin should be allowed to fade before treatment. That last point applies to recent holidays and self-tan as much as to natural tone, and it applies to both treatments.

Suitability is always assessed in person, and a patch test is part of that.

Side by Side

  Laser IPL
Light produced One precise wavelength A broad band, filtered to the target
Best at Precision and depth Covering larger areas quickly
Hair removal The stronger evidence base Can reduce hair, less reliably
Scattered sun damage Workable, slower over large areas Usually the better fit
Diffuse facial redness Less suited to broad redness Well established
Individual visible vessels Often the better tool Less targeted
Deeper skin tones More options, with the right wavelength Greater care needed, often unsuitable
Tattoo removal Requires a specific laser type Not used for this

What About Home IPL Devices?

Home devices sold for hair removal are almost always IPL rather than laser, and they operate at considerably lower energy than clinic equipment. That is a deliberate safety decision rather than a flaw.

The practical consequences are that progress is slower, sessions are needed more often and for longer, and results tend to be less complete. They also carry the same skin tone limitations as clinic IPL, usually more strictly, and most carry explicit warnings against use on deeper skin tones.

If a home device suits your skin and hair colouring and you are content with a gradual result, there is nothing wrong with using one. It is simply a different proposition from a course of medical-grade laser, and it is worth knowing that before deciding which you are buying.

Choosing a Clinic

Because both treatments involve directing significant energy at skin, who holds the handpiece matters as much as which device it belongs to.

The NHS advises checking that your practitioner is experienced and suitably qualified, and is on a register confirming standards for training, skill and insurance, rather than someone who has completed only a short course.

Two further questions are worth asking. Which device will be used for my specific concern, and why that one? And will I have a patch test before a full session? A clinic that only has one technology will, understandably, recommend that technology. Having both means the answer can be matched to the concern. If neither suits you, we would rather say so.

You can meet our practitioners on the meet the team page, and current pricing for both treatments is on our price list.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IPL the same as laser? No. A laser produces a single precise wavelength of light, while IPL produces a broad band of wavelengths that is then filtered towards the target. The practical difference is that laser offers precision and depth, while IPL covers larger areas quickly and can act on more than one target at a time.

Which is better for hair removal, IPL or laser? Laser has the stronger evidence base. Randomised trials and the Cochrane review support laser for meaningful hair reduction, while the evidence for IPL in hair removal is weaker. IPL can reduce hair, but less reliably, which matters for a treatment taken as a course over several months.

Is IPL safe for darker skin tones? It needs particular care and is often unsuitable. IPL’s broad output includes shorter wavelengths that are readily absorbed by melanin in the surrounding skin, raising the risk of pigment changes in deeper skin tones. Longer-wavelength laser options are generally the safer route, and suitability is always assessed at consultation with a patch test.

Will laser hair removal remove my hair permanently? No treatment has documented permanent hair removal, and the NHS states that laser hair removal is not permanent and will not necessarily remove all hair. What a course achieves is a substantial, long-lasting reduction, usually with occasional maintenance sessions afterwards. Results vary between individuals.

Can IPL treat melasma? Melasma is best assessed before any light-based treatment is considered, because it can react badly to heat and light and may darken in response. A depigmenting approach is often more appropriate. Identifying which type of pigmentation you have is the necessary first step.

How many sessions will I need? That depends on the treatment, the area and what is being treated. The NHS notes that laser hair removal sessions are typically spaced around every four weeks for facial hair and every six to eight weeks for body hair. We will give you a realistic estimate at consultation rather than a fixed number in advance.

Do I need a patch test? Yes. A patch test checks how your skin responds at the settings proposed for you, and it is a standard part of starting either treatment.

Can I have treatment if I have a tan? Not usually. Tanned skin, whether from the sun, a sunbed or self-tan, raises the risk of an unwanted reaction and should be allowed to fade first. We will advise how long to wait at your consultation.

Book Your Free Consultation

If you are unsure whether IPL or laser is the right route for your hair or your skin, the quickest way to find out is to have it looked at properly.

Book a free consultation at House of Aesthetics in Bromley. We will assess your skin and hair, explain which treatment suits your concern and your skin tone, and set out what is realistic. There is no obligation and no charge for the consultation.

Call us on 020 8290 0099, visit us at 14 Market Square, Bromley BR1 1NA, or book online.

Sources

Medical Disclaimer

This article is provided for general information and does not constitute medical advice. Suitability for laser or IPL treatment depends on your individual skin type, skin tone, medical history, current medication and recent sun exposure, and will be assessed at consultation along with a patch test. Not all skin marks are suitable for cosmetic treatment. If a mark is new, changing, itching, bleeding or not healing, please consult your GP before seeking cosmetic treatment. Results vary between individuals and no outcome can be guaranteed.

More
articles